Creative Writing for Business

A place to share, read and discuss different types of writing about research and practice in all the places of business – work and play.

Menu

Adelaide Coastline, photograph by P.J. Sandiford

Book Burning in an era of paperlessness, by Peter John Sandiford

Listening to a BBC news podcast I was shocked that the then new labour government (in 2024) announced a financial black hole of GB£20 billion inherited from the previous Tory government. This wasn’t the shocking thing though, as we can never trust any government financial records. What is truly disgusting is how this was used as a justification to cut libraries and central funding (UK libraries are primarily funded by local authorities, with little support from the national government, but even this was to be cut wherever possible). Even if all funding was removed, this would go almost nowhere towards funding the black hole as much less than that figure is spent. The proposal also ignores the huge socio-cultural value of libraries. Even beyond this, the news led me down a steep and twisty path of reflection; there seems to be a significant relevance for this website as this attitude of (supposedly) the political party of the people, towards social cohesion, communication and community. It seems, to me, to be nothing less than a form of book-burning where knowledge and community are the target of out-of-touch politicians who seek only to play their own short-termist and self-obsessed power games. One other observation I might make would be that whenever I use a freer form of verse I can get a little distracted and end up somewhere else altogether (often returning to my favourite old hobbyhorses)…

The victor writes history
Or burns it.

The electronic age, one more era of book burning,
More permanent than Montag’s kerosene.
Politicians defund libraries;
Libraries cull print;
Electronica rules;
Its insubstantially intangible word,
Ironically fragile, almost replaces paper.

Memory became
Gossip became
Epic became
Stone became
Parchment became
Paper became
Magnetic tape became
Elusive electrons
Each modern medium easier to revise (redact and censor),
Harder to preserve and protect.

Discarnate documents available to all
If you have the hard/soft-ware to view them.
Technology strategically reduces durability…
Planned obsolescence matches increasing fragile ideas.

But worse than ephemeral e-words,
Pandering to digital impatience
(Time poor in every way but temporal),
Interminable drab scrolling at home or work
With family or friends,
On bus or train,
Dining or drilling in the gym,
Dating or drinking with buddies.

So much time wasted, no time for reading.
Abridgement Rules No K;
TLDNR
or
Too long to start today (or tomorrow).

Don’t even click on click-bait before commenting;
The misleading title’s sufficient.
Newness valued as new – even if it’s really old;
Novelty disingenuously defined,
Clever reconceptualization shadows historic tall shoulders,
Borrowing ideas to a postmodern objectivity.

Opinion Trumps evidence and reason.
We abide in an uncertain positivism –
Carefully constructed questions,
Within a biased questionnaire, seek clean data.
Responses that satisfy statistical convenience
Little more than pointless pretence.
Complex formulae interpret unfactual facts,
Unrandom randomness,
Unrepresentative representations.

If all else fails I can always rely 
On the AI like lies.


Peter John Sandiford, 29th August 2025

2 responses to “Book Burning in an era of paperlessness, by Peter John Sandiford”

  1. Dr Ankit Agarwal (AA, the talking wall) Avatar
    Dr Ankit Agarwal (AA, the talking wall)

    The concerns raised about the recent cuts to library funding resonate deeply in today’s electronic society.

    I find libraries to be more than just places to borrow books; they are so important community hubs that foster learning, creativity and social interaction. Reducing their funding undermines access to information and diminishes the sense of community that libraries cultivate. It’s troubling to see essential resources sacrificed for short-term financial fixes, especially when the long-term impact on social cohesion and public knowledge can be so detrimental.

    The metaphor of book burning is particularly striking. It serves as a reminder of the historical struggles against censorship and the importance of preserving different voices and narratives. In an era of digital supremacy where information can be easily manipulated or erased, we must advocate for institutions that protect our cultural heritage. Libraries provide a safe space for exploration and discovery, allowing individuals to engage with ideas that challenge their perspectives and enrich their understanding of the world.

    Also, the shift towards digital media (focused on AI tools and short cuts) raises important questions about the durability and reliability of information. While technology offers convenience (or roadmap to sterile mind), it can also lead to a superficial engagement with content (eg generative AI). The ease of accessing information online often comes at the cost of depth and critical analysis. As we navigate this digital environment, it’s critical to cultivate habits that prioritise thoughtful reading and reflection over fleeting distractions. Though I am unsure if new pundits flaunting their (pseudo) grasp of AI would be overly interested in welcoming this sort of thinking.

    In light of these challenges, we must recognise the essential role libraries play in promoting literacy and lifelong learning. I believe that “Supporting” them is not just about preserving books; it’s about investing in the intellectual and cultural fabric of our society. By advocating for libraries and ensuring they receive the funding they need, we can help create a more informed and engaged public, ultimately strengthening our communities.

    -Ankit Agarwal (AA, the talking wall)

    Vice President, Friends of the Library, Adelaide, Australia

    Like

Leave a reply to Peter Sandiford Cancel reply